-
• #51502
wannabe-porn photography with the chain on the smallest cog and crank ? I'd say fail.
Have to agree, basic error. Nice bike though...
-
• #51503
it is true, basic bike photography fail....
...to be really anal, cranks aren't at a great angle, and the photo has been taken from the wrong angle, you can see the inside of the left fork, and too much of the handle bars... and valve alignment (intentionally opposing?)
amateur!
-
• #51504
How does that bike stay up on its own? Magic?
-
• #51505
How does that bike stay up on its own? Magnets?
.
-
• #51506
Or just a wire frame under bb?
-
• #51507
Where're the magnets? Where's the wire frame? Im talking about the bike with lightweight wheels.
-
• #51508
smugness evaporated
Cropped close to frame. Balanced and released?
-
• #51509
I'm sorry.
-
• #51510
Not just the photography, isn't that small/small gear combination also the worst for riding ?
-
• #51511
Where're the magnets?
Lolz! They will have just photo chopped whatever it was out of the picture...
-
• #51512
Sorry .. But that build is all about weight and big money spending to get to that weight. And even with that money there is lighter bikes out there. No one specs Ax Lightness parts unless you're chasing weight and have silly money to spend .. take a look around the web at their reputation for premature failure.
Exactly.
@Hugo7. Read your posts before pressing Submit. It'll save us a lot of time and you a lot of embarrassment.
-
• #51513
got a question with insane carbon builds like the 11lb job above.
Just ***HOW ***strong/tough/ride-able are they? I mean if your flying down a mountain @ 30-40mph+ and come across a string of potholes (not monsters, just your average 1" square edged job) that you can't avoid, does poo come out?
-
• #51514
Of the hole?
-
• #51515
That's why saddles have a curve and a hole
-
• #51517
Very stylish @ jambon, more pics?
-
• #51518
Very stylish @ jambon, more pics?
From here: http://prollyisnotprobably.com/2011/08/two_slick_650b_tourers.php
-
• #51519
I think this is my second favourite headbadge of all time.
-
• #51520
Just ***HOW ***strong/tough/ride-able are they?
Like all bikes, they vary. Some are badly compromised in the areas of utility and durability, many use components with rider weight restrictions, but some pretty light bikes are made only from components proven on the Pro tour, even in the Spring Classics, e.g. Cervelo R3SL is Roubaix proof even at ~800g, Lightweight Standard wheels have been ridden on many TdF mountain stages and only seem to break if you hit a dog.
I can't recall seeing anything under about 5.7kg that I'd ride in anger, but I'm a 90kg sprinter, not a 60kg mountain climber. Oh, and you're not 'flying' down a mountain if you're only doing 40mph, you can go faster than that coasting down some of the short descents in the Chilterns and Cotswolds.
-
• #51521
Take of the Ax-lightness stuff and put some pro tour proven equipment on .. as mdcc_tester said .. the bike would probably gain a pound or so, but still be light weight and you'd not run the risk of your face kissing the front wheel when the stem breaks ..
I'm not rubbishing Ax equipment, it's made by people that make and design carbon parts for some major race car teams. But it is pushing the limits and IMHO only big money weight weenies need apply.
-
• #51522
Terrible pic, but I think it deserves it...
-
• #51523
Wow, truly flattered, thanks.
Tis a shite pic though. Plan to borrow the mrs DSLR, and snap some of the nice features of the frame and components.
-
• #51524
Tis a shite bike though
That's a bit harsh, I'm sure it will ride nicely and at least when you're on it you won't have to look at it.
-
• #51525
Terrible pic, but I think it deserves it...
just another carbon off the peg weight weenie measurebator build.
and yellow bar tape????
Is that a Madone frame with a custom paint job? Haven't seen a Trek with such pared back decals before.