You are the one playing semantics! You selectively took words from the last definition I posted, so I added the ones you strategically excluded.
Who is the "we" you refer to. A double elimination tourney has a final that may consist of one or two games, depending on the outcome of the first. This is standard, well and good. It is not hard to understand. No one here misunderstands it. Some people seem to dislike it, but it makes perfect sense. It is a logically consistent ***double ***elimination.
You are the one playing semantics! You selectively took words from the last definition I posted, so I added the ones you strategically excluded.
Who is the "we" you refer to. A double elimination tourney has a final that may consist of one or two games, depending on the outcome of the first. This is standard, well and good. It is not hard to understand. No one here misunderstands it. Some people seem to dislike it, but it makes perfect sense. It is a logically consistent ***double ***elimination.