• I did read your post, you were repeating what I already mentioned in my original post; I know it is to delay things, that wasn't my question.

    It's absurd to refer a deal which has already been rejected. They say the deal hasn't changed on the grounds of competition, so what has changed?

    I'm sure they're all OK with it being absurd if it passes the hot potato, but they still have to give a reason come the review, I'm wondering what they're banking on.

About

Avatar for neu @neu started