-
• #3477
^
Cheers. That clarifies things a little.TBH I need to find one of those really good BBC-style diagrams with all the timelines and parties.
.... to change it now would allow News Int. to sue the government....
I don't think they would 'sue'. It would go to Judicial Review. Where on the face of it, it looks like they'd have a pretty good case.
-
• #3478
I don't think they would 'sue'. It would go to Judicial Review. Where on the face of it, it looks like they'd have a pretty good case.
Ah ok.
I became friends with [Mr Coulson] and I think he did his job for me in a very effective way. He became a friend and he is a friend.
I bet he did a good job for you ...
Also, who comes up with the names for investigations - Operation Weeting & Operation Elveden ?!
-
• #3479
Mount Hekla to erupt in Iceland, waiting, waiting..
how soon is soon? cos my boss is flying out today,
praying he gets stuck abroad for about a month.. -
• #3480
I think last night Shirley Williams seemed to suggest that there was a "fit and proper person" test that could be used by OFCOM to thwart the takeover
Richard Desmond passed that test when he bought C5.
-
• #3481
space shuttle launch http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14076454
-
• #3482
^ was just about to say that!
-
• #3483
It all makes you wonder, but only slightly, why there never was any phone hacking whatsoever at that paragon of highbrow, responsible journalism, The Sun.
-
• #3484
wait.
what does "rinsed the panel" mean?
-
• #3486
Audio of Rebekah Brooks facing the NoTW staff has leaked
Awwwwwwwkward
-
• #3487
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/2011/01/rupert_murdoch_-_a_portrait_of.html
For those interested, a blog post by Adam Curtis (who did that excellent Watched Over by Machines of Love and Grace documentary series a few months back) about the BBC's coverage and distrust of Rupert Murdoch since he first came to the UK in 1968.
-
• #3488
All this NOTW brouhaha has kept the wedding of La Moss quiet
-
• #3489
wait.
what does "rinsed the panel" mean?
Washing your car.
-
• #3490
All this NOTW brouhaha has kept the wedding of La Moss quiet
It was a week ago!
Still didn't get an invite.
-
• #3491
First Prancer's BBQ and now this.
-
• #3492
Don't do it Will...
-
• #3493
It's not worth it.
-
• #3494
Go and plug your laptop in at the Starbucks down the road.
-
• #3495
5%
-
• #3496
Now on the rex offenders register......
http://www.joe.ie/news-politics/current-affairs/irish-woman-dies-after-dog-sex-0013864-1
-
• #3497
Someone should make a short, 5 line poem about that.
-
• #3498
There was a young woman from Limerick
Who prefered knobs to look like a lipstick
Anaphylactic shock
Was too much for the doc
And the dog finished himself off with some chopsticks -
• #3499
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to neu again.
.
-
• #3500
The last line is shit tho
I think broadly speaking you're right here, but in addition to the media plurality debate, OFCOM has a responsibility to ensure that BSkyB is controlled by the aforementioned 'fit and proper persons'. If the practices of News of the Word indicate that the people running Newscorp are either delinquent in their duty to ensure that the paper was operating within the law, or complicit in that activity, then OFCOM ought to seek to prevent the takeover. And frankly, I cannot see an outcome of the current situation which doesn't imply one or the other of these two conclusions. I think the real difficulty is proving it; the idea that Murdoch was skipping blithly through the fields whistling Tiptoe Through the Tulips when he was meant to be managing Newscorp is utterly ridiculous, but it would be very difficult to prove that he was actively involved and therefore complicit. the real knockout blow would come if some smart investigative journo could uncover similar activity in the US or some other market.
Bearing in mind that Newscorps' first posited offer for BSkyB was rejected by the latter as too low, I think that we'll certainly se a delay in the takeover proceedings while they fight fires here. it will be difficult for Newscorp to back out of the acquisition now, as US investors will get skittish if they do, but every media outlet that he doesn't own is going to be desperately clawing for purchase against them. I think it's going to be very difficult to quieten this down without getting rid of Brooks - which as stated by others will imply that the rot goes right to the top.
As for the comments about her hair, I actually think it's the best thing about her.