not really, more that if i'm already putting myself right at the low-end of calorie intake for me to lose weight 'healthily' then the additional exercise is in danger of pushing me into the crash-diet area in terms of calorific deficit which is unhealthy and will probably lead to the weight coming straight back again when I ease off the diet.
put simply when I was just dieting last year I would eat 1800 calories a day. because I didn't really exercise I knew that it was safe for me to do that.
now I cycle say I burn 250 calories each way cycling to work I end up with a net intake of 1300 which is much too low for a healthy adult male to be eating.
but on the other end if i were to take garmin at their word (which I wouldn't) and eat an additional 1400 calories a day to 'balance' out my 12 miles of commuting I'd probably be eating about 700-900 calories too much.
somewhere in between those two points is the sweet spot, but I'm not sure how to find it.
not really, more that if i'm already putting myself right at the low-end of calorie intake for me to lose weight 'healthily' then the additional exercise is in danger of pushing me into the crash-diet area in terms of calorific deficit which is unhealthy and will probably lead to the weight coming straight back again when I ease off the diet.
put simply when I was just dieting last year I would eat 1800 calories a day. because I didn't really exercise I knew that it was safe for me to do that.
now I cycle say I burn 250 calories each way cycling to work I end up with a net intake of 1300 which is much too low for a healthy adult male to be eating.
but on the other end if i were to take garmin at their word (which I wouldn't) and eat an additional 1400 calories a day to 'balance' out my 12 miles of commuting I'd probably be eating about 700-900 calories too much.
somewhere in between those two points is the sweet spot, but I'm not sure how to find it.