David Millar has some odd views on doping. First he casts doubt on Armstrong, albeit in a mealy mouthed way, then he says this
*You don't win the biggest races in the world with such clockwork regularity and comparative ease, and in such style, by not being the supreme talent and clean. In my experience the profile of a doper is always much more erratic and unpredictable.
*but he's not talking about Armstrong, he's talking about Contador. Can he not see the contradiction? Then again he cried with disappointment when Vino was exposed so maybe he is not worth listening to at all? *
David Millar has some odd views on doping. First he casts doubt on Armstrong, albeit in a mealy mouthed way, then he says this
*You don't win the biggest races in the world with such clockwork regularity and comparative ease, and in such style, by not being the supreme talent and clean. In my experience the profile of a doper is always much more erratic and unpredictable.
*but he's not talking about Armstrong, he's talking about Contador. Can he not see the contradiction? Then again he cried with disappointment when Vino was exposed so maybe he is not worth listening to at all? *
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/millar-calls-for-closure-in-armstrong-and-contador-investigations
*