The 2nd article wasn't very friendly, certainly. Some of the views seemed to be more wrapped up in puritanism e.g. the attitudes towards pleasure / drugs; and there were some statements that seemed to be damning whatever e.g. pro-choice & pro-life attitudes were put under the same umbrella.
Interestingly, in the comments, someone picks up on autistic neurological reactions to sexual stimuli (including pornography), and the writer of the blog certainly presents with the unbending psychology of someone on the spectrum.
But neither of these things should be allowed to prejudice a reader's overall reaction to the blog, which is a demand for society to recognise some of the negative and ingrained patriarchal realities, realities which ultimately disempower and oppress half the population.
The fact that rape is technically a crime is practically meaningless when the legal infrastructure is corrupt, subjective, archaic, and controlled by men - especially when these men often come from a background that panders to a skewed perception of women and women's 'place' in society. Time and time again, rape has been tolerated (and so condoned/supported) by decisions made in court, plus the treatment of women testifying in court.
Whether 'rape is very clearly regarded by almost everyone as something very wrong' is also a moot point. It ignores the fact that some people will use a fuzzy definition of rape as a justification for having non-consensual sex, or for defending the actions of someone who has done so.
Once more, this goes back to the first linked blog: how do you think all this negativity and nit-picking from men is going to be perceived by the female population? Would it make you feel less nervous about the threat of sexual assault, knowing that men still need no encouragement to argue the toss about the statistics of rape, or focus on 'hysterical' points within a many-pronged argument?
The second article had a good point in there, but you had to wade through the hamfisted vitriol to find it. Most people will ignore it because of this.
Post a reply
Bold
Italics
Link
Image
List
Quote
code
Preview
Formatting Help
Don't worry about formatting, just type in the text and we'll take care of making sense of it. We will auto-convert links, and if you put asterisks around words we will make them bold.
Tips:
Create headers by underlining text with ==== or ----
To *italicise* text put one asterisk each side of the word
To **bold** text put two asterisks each side of the word
Embed images by entering: ![](https://www.google.co.uk/images/srpr/logo4w.png) That's the hard one: exclamation, square brackets and then the URL to the image in brackets.
* Create lists by starting lines with asterisks
1. Create numbered lists by starting lines with a number and a dot
> Quote text by starting lines with >
Mention another user by @username
For syntax highlighting, surround the code block with three backticks:
```
Your code goes here
```
Just like Github, a blank line must precede a code block.
If you upload more than 5 files we will display all attachments as thumbnails.
The 2nd article wasn't very friendly, certainly. Some of the views seemed to be more wrapped up in puritanism e.g. the attitudes towards pleasure / drugs; and there were some statements that seemed to be damning whatever e.g. pro-choice & pro-life attitudes were put under the same umbrella.
Interestingly, in the comments, someone picks up on autistic neurological reactions to sexual stimuli (including pornography), and the writer of the blog certainly presents with the unbending psychology of someone on the spectrum.
But neither of these things should be allowed to prejudice a reader's overall reaction to the blog, which is a demand for society to recognise some of the negative and ingrained patriarchal realities, realities which ultimately disempower and oppress half the population.
The fact that rape is technically a crime is practically meaningless when the legal infrastructure is corrupt, subjective, archaic, and controlled by men - especially when these men often come from a background that panders to a skewed perception of women and women's 'place' in society. Time and time again, rape has been tolerated (and so condoned/supported) by decisions made in court, plus the treatment of women testifying in court.
Whether 'rape is very clearly regarded by almost everyone as something very wrong' is also a moot point. It ignores the fact that some people will use a fuzzy definition of rape as a justification for having non-consensual sex, or for defending the actions of someone who has done so.
Once more, this goes back to the first linked blog: how do you think all this negativity and nit-picking from men is going to be perceived by the female population? Would it make you feel less nervous about the threat of sexual assault, knowing that men still need no encouragement to argue the toss about the statistics of rape, or focus on 'hysterical' points within a many-pronged argument?