It's a simple assumption. Why disturbed?
It could be that each rapist rapes 1 woman (yes, men get raped too, but sticking with this stat), which would put rapists at approximately 1 in every 6 men. Is that any better?
Or it could be an average of 2, or 20. It doesn't make a huge amount of difference to what the post is trying to communicate, does it? It's still a lot.
It's a simple assumption. Why disturbed?
It could be that each rapist rapes 1 woman (yes, men get raped too, but sticking with this stat), which would put rapists at approximately 1 in every 6 men. Is that any better?
Or it could be an average of 2, or 20. It doesn't make a huge amount of difference to what the post is trying to communicate, does it? It's still a lot.