I really can't see how any monies raised by Armstrong for his good causes absolves him from any guilt or testing
especially when it may be viewed that those monies may have been raised fraudulently, if not legally fraudulently then definitely may be perceived as ethically fraudulent as the story of his recovery and subsequent athletic success which inspired millions to give may very well be a big lie.....those figures look worrying too, though I would assume that U.S. charities fall under some sort of inspection and scrutiny and that Livestrong has probably fallen within the law.
especially when it may be viewed that those monies may have been raised fraudulently, if not legally fraudulently then definitely may be perceived as ethically fraudulent as the story of his recovery and subsequent athletic success which inspired millions to give may very well be a big lie.....those figures look worrying too, though I would assume that U.S. charities fall under some sort of inspection and scrutiny and that Livestrong has probably fallen within the law.