National Series 2011

Updated schedule:

May: Brighton
June: Manchester (UK Champs 2011)
July: Edinburgh
August: London Open 2011
September: TBC
October: TBC (Cambridge approached)

Been giving some thought to the 3/4 scores issue...

I ran a few models using weighted random data and found that on average ~20% of teams would finish in a different place. Neither is perfect but using 4 is more likely to give us accurate placings. It may also provide an incentive for people to play more tournaments or it may make them think there's no point. Not sure and I think it's close between the two. The consensus on here seems to be that 4 is fine (remember you can use a sub), so for this year I think it would be prudent to lean towards accurate final standings and stick with 4 scores.

Just wondering is it best of 4 scores but do you still qualify if you only play in 3 or do you have to play in 4?