PS. This may not work, but we could try choosing the teams tonight, between the peeps who are there?
Rather than doing deals for players, we could all agree on 3 teams we think will do best for BHM polo as a whole?
]
This will be madly problematic - and I'd rather be playing than discussing. Also, there's a few people I'd much rather not be teamed up with and I don't want to have to mince my words to avoid causing offence.
@pete - I don't really expect it to mean better results at tournaments, but I reckon the general standards will rise. It's more for raising the level of competetive play in Brum. Kind of like extending what we did on sunday, when with 9 people we all get used to playing with the same people as a team rather than random inconsequential throw ins which encourage individual play/greediness. Also, bear in mind Cambridge sounds like birmingham's worst tourney performance since the euros 2009, so we are already capable of better!
As far as 5 people consigned to whoopings, yes, kind of. But they are already. To repeat, I'm not suggesting we use these teams exclusively, just a few games at every event with whichever teams have 2 of 3 there. Given patchy attendance, I don't even think that will mean other people sitting out any more than currently.
I understand the reservations, but for me, games like on Sunday were so much better than the random throw-ins, that's it's an idea worth pursuing, and this seems much preferable to the current situation (seeding). The third option is just to say fuck it and let everyone organise themselves.
This will be madly problematic - and I'd rather be playing than discussing. Also, there's a few people I'd much rather not be teamed up with and I don't want to have to mince my words to avoid causing offence.
@pete - I don't really expect it to mean better results at tournaments, but I reckon the general standards will rise. It's more for raising the level of competetive play in Brum. Kind of like extending what we did on sunday, when with 9 people we all get used to playing with the same people as a team rather than random inconsequential throw ins which encourage individual play/greediness. Also, bear in mind Cambridge sounds like birmingham's worst tourney performance since the euros 2009, so we are already capable of better!
As far as 5 people consigned to whoopings, yes, kind of. But they are already. To repeat, I'm not suggesting we use these teams exclusively, just a few games at every event with whichever teams have 2 of 3 there. Given patchy attendance, I don't even think that will mean other people sitting out any more than currently.
I understand the reservations, but for me, games like on Sunday were so much better than the random throw-ins, that's it's an idea worth pursuing, and this seems much preferable to the current situation (seeding). The third option is just to say fuck it and let everyone organise themselves.