Like I said before Seeding and any other method work in the same way, if your good/committed then you will find your way into the best teams. Maybe we should keep seeding, but create say 3 or 4 teams, that way we will have the best of both worlds.. I voted no to seeding. but that's not to say I would be too bothered if it continued...
An example from the idea above would be to have:
Team 1 - top 3 seeded
Team 2 - 4-6 seeded
Team 3 - 7-9 seeded
Team 4 - 10-12 seeded
As a tournament approaches we play each other to see who should go. this way the best players (at that time) will represent Brum, we will have our definitive teams, but we won't feel like it holds us back when tournaments approach...
The more I think about this, the more I struggle to find a fault, it seems to cover the bases, so any points about would be great.
Like I said before Seeding and any other method work in the same way, if your good/committed then you will find your way into the best teams. Maybe we should keep seeding, but create say 3 or 4 teams, that way we will have the best of both worlds.. I voted no to seeding. but that's not to say I would be too bothered if it continued...
An example from the idea above would be to have:
Team 1 - top 3 seeded
Team 2 - 4-6 seeded
Team 3 - 7-9 seeded
Team 4 - 10-12 seeded
As a tournament approaches we play each other to see who should go. this way the best players (at that time) will represent Brum, we will have our definitive teams, but we won't feel like it holds us back when tournaments approach...
The more I think about this, the more I struggle to find a fault, it seems to cover the bases, so any points about would be great.