You are reading a single comment by @EMM and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
@EMM
I think throw-in sessions are still best for BHM, but maybe say if Danski and Hyper get shuffled onto the same team, keep it that way, enjoy playing together (wheeeeyo) and also let the other players experience playing against two thirds of Stabbeth? This way we still continue with throw-ins and its fair. Also, I think that playing against your teammates is possibly a better way to see how they play?
To clear up the part you weren't sure about earlier Dan, I meant that if the best players (you, Hyper, Andy) were seeded lower than players who were clearly not as good, is it fair for BHM Polo as a whole to send the slightly worse player just because the seeding dictated it? It would never happen, as I assume we would always be honest etc... but the point is that the result is set in stone, and unless seeding takes place more regularly the teams we send to the tournaments may not accurately reflect BHM.
StuF missed out on Cambridge (before the broken wheel) because he wasn't ranked high enough to make the Birmingham B team, but say Sarah and Pete would rather play with Stu than me, surely they have every right to go and make that change, I know that beef will be an issue here, and i'm expecting some critisism on that one, but i think we are all sensible, it would be all gravy in the end, and besides you can't have 'all gravy' without 'beef'. whheeeeyyyyyyyyyyy