Understood, I wasn't trying to accuse you of the 'it's on Wiki therefore it's true' fallacy, only that the idea is questionable.
I'd say anarco-capilism is true anarchism, or at leas the conclusion of anarchism, but I's also agree that anarcho-communism is what people (certainly in the UK) understand as anarchism.
Yes, it is what people understand it to be, but that just shows the lack understanding of the followers. I doubt anyone who understands what anarchism actually is would follow it.
Yes, it is what people understand it to be, but that just shows the lack understanding of the followers. I doubt anyone who understands what anarchism actually is would follow it.