-
So Hague should fly Ryaniair, right?
-
It's a bit of a non-starter as a point isn't it? I bet he'll have fillet steak while he's there as well, while I have to make do with rump. Tory bastard.
-
If we're all in this together surely he should fly BA or some other "regular" airline.
It's all good and well for Cameron to put a wind turbine on his roof to become "the acceptable face of the Tories" but it has no substance if his subordinates are squandering resources the way they are.Also, 50% of the party funding came from the City, no surprise there either.
-
When he says we're in all in this together I don't think he's referring to an aeroplane.
I agree with you general position though, that they are all scum-sucking bastards.
Although I quite like Hague in a way, he seems to have a certain respect for what's gone before and a bit of dignity, unlike Ed Miliband and his ilk (by which I don't necessarily mean other Labour MPs).
-
What it "actually means" is I basically believe him be a learned man with humility and integrity, as opposed to a so-called career politician who will say absolutely anything to appear virtuous. I basically trust him. It's just a shame he's so... conservative.
What's gone before = history, as opposed to the anti-history attitude of New Labour.
-
When he says we're in all in this together I don't think he's referring to an aeroplane.
Good point, Josh.
Quite apart from the difficulty of fitting everybody in, there are very specific laws about overloading aeroplanes, and very severe penalties for breaking them.Jaw would be wise to think upon the consequences of his words in future.
-
Funny though – when Hague was leader, nothing could disassociate my feelings to him from his rabid young Tory-boy address to their conference years ago, when he was a lad. Wanted nothing but to deck him. Now, after the event, he seems reasonable. Prejudicial and fickle lot, the public.
-
Funny though – when Hague was leader, nothing could disassociate my feelings to him from his rabid young Tory-boy address to their conference years ago, when he was a lad. Wanted nothing but to deck him. Now, after the event, he seems reasonable. Prejudicial and fickle lot, the public.
There is something about electoral defeat which humanises party leaders. Perhaps they lose the arrogant streak or something.
Except Brown and Michael Howard, obviously.
Doesn't seem to be the same for leaders who step down (Blair) or lose leadership contests (Heath, Thatcher). They still seem to remain cunts.
-
What it "actually means" is I basically believe him be a learned man with humility and integrity, as opposed to a so-called career politician who will say absolutely anything to appear virtuous. I basically trust him. It's just a shame he's so... conservative.
What's gone before = history, as opposed to the anti-history attitude of New Labour.
I'm not a fan of new labour but I'd be interested as to why you view them as anti-history?
-
I love reposts
-
This needs a new thread that we can all be in together:
n3il
mr_tom
StandardPractice
wibble
jaw
bq
TheorySwine
hippy
deleted
Oliver Schick-
Post a reply
About
General Election 2010
Posted by
@lpg
Time for a bump - If we're all in this together, why is that William Hague is flying to the Middle East in a private jet and I'm still flying Ryanair?