That's my point. What they've done is illegal, the notice they have put up has no legal weight. But the signs do say no cycling. Which is wrong therefore, on two counts - legally, and according to the points I (and others) have made above. We are saying same thing, methinks.
And anyway, you can't just put up signs willy-nillly saying get off here, can't ride there etc, with no legal basis. On such grounds I might go through central London tomorrow putting no entry signs with cycle contraflows on as many roads as I like and apply for permission retrospectively. That's not how things work, innit.
That's my point. What they've done is illegal, the notice they have put up has no legal weight. But the signs do say no cycling. Which is wrong therefore, on two counts - legally, and according to the points I (and others) have made above. We are saying same thing, methinks.
And anyway, you can't just put up signs willy-nillly saying get off here, can't ride there etc, with no legal basis. On such grounds I might go through central London tomorrow putting no entry signs with cycle contraflows on as many roads as I like and apply for permission retrospectively. That's not how things work, innit.