Do you want to go for a drink sometime, perhaps a meal, maybe even go on the London Eye ?
I have a suit.
I know that aperture etc won't affect how the file itself is read. I was probably using the wrong words to describe what I meant, I was refering to the video settings (1920 x 1280, 1280 x 720 etc) hence why I put a picture of them to save me typing them out. I was trying to ask about the relative pro/cons of those options in terms of handling the files produced by each
Of the two screens you showed in your post use what you want - they will all work just fine - but as a guide:
1920 x 1080 - is the highest resolution - best choice normally.
1280 x 720 - is lower resolution, but gives you the option of shooting at double speed (50fps rather than 25fps) - so you can do stuff like slow motion.
640 x 480 - forget it's there.
Of the two different modes NTSC or PAL (what separates the two screens you showed) probably stick to PAL as we live in a PAL country - if only to make things a little less confusing for you.
Dropping resolution from 1920 x 1080 to 1280 x 720 or even 640 x 480 - will not help 'handling' as they all shoot at the same bitrate.
Do you want to go for a drink sometime, perhaps a meal, maybe even go on the London Eye ?
I have a suit.
Of the two screens you showed in your post use what you want - they will all work just fine - but as a guide:
1920 x 1080 - is the highest resolution - best choice normally.
1280 x 720 - is lower resolution, but gives you the option of shooting at double speed (50fps rather than 25fps) - so you can do stuff like slow motion.
640 x 480 - forget it's there.
Of the two different modes NTSC or PAL (what separates the two screens you showed) probably stick to PAL as we live in a PAL country - if only to make things a little less confusing for you.
Dropping resolution from 1920 x 1080 to 1280 x 720 or even 640 x 480 - will not help 'handling' as they all shoot at the same bitrate.