I think there are some valid opinions on both sides here, but I don't want this to turn into an internet pissing contest (I will simply close the thread).
The STV committee have always asked for feedback and I suggest anyone with ideas should continue to provide it. The situation is unique in that it doesn't follow the huge budget yet straightforward demands of the indoor velodrome and despite the architects being well versed with that, it is entirely possible that some key aspects may be overlooked.
As an example, I am determined that there be storage and equipment (specialist tricycles and bikes) to allow riders with disabilities and wheelchair users to enjoy the experience of cycling in a safe, traffic free environment (ie: the concrete "warm up track" and safety area). It would be nothing short of criminal if something like this was ignored.
I think there are some valid opinions on both sides here, but I don't want this to turn into an internet pissing contest (I will simply close the thread).
The STV committee have always asked for feedback and I suggest anyone with ideas should continue to provide it. The situation is unique in that it doesn't follow the huge budget yet straightforward demands of the indoor velodrome and despite the architects being well versed with that, it is entirely possible that some key aspects may be overlooked.
As an example, I am determined that there be storage and equipment (specialist tricycles and bikes) to allow riders with disabilities and wheelchair users to enjoy the experience of cycling in a safe, traffic free environment (ie: the concrete "warm up track" and safety area). It would be nothing short of criminal if something like this was ignored.