You're response seems to be pointing to this: If B is not happy when "this happens," then they should be C.
No, I've not said anything even remotely like that.
"What I am saying" (I got that line off Tony Blair) is that I don't recognise the comparison between an 18k hypothetical tax that is immediately payable and presumably mandatory and presumably without obvious consideration/return/reward . . .
. . . with a tuition fee that ultimately is optional, pays for a college education of your choice, in most cases leads to higher earnings and can be paid off in a way that makes it affordable to everyone.
Going back to your original point - if we forcibly imposed a 18k tax of some kind we'd see a whole lot more people on the streets - I can't see how this (out hypothetical 18k tax) is comparable to the tuition fees, the dynamic of the two are so completely different.
No, I've not said anything even remotely like that.
"What I am saying" (I got that line off Tony Blair) is that I don't recognise the comparison between an 18k hypothetical tax that is immediately payable and presumably mandatory and presumably without obvious consideration/return/reward . . .
. . . with a tuition fee that ultimately is optional, pays for a college education of your choice, in most cases leads to higher earnings and can be paid off in a way that makes it affordable to everyone.
Going back to your original point - if we forcibly imposed a 18k tax of some kind we'd see a whole lot more people on the streets - I can't see how this (out hypothetical 18k tax) is comparable to the tuition fees, the dynamic of the two are so completely different.