You are reading a single comment by @pajamas and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Wouldn't it be easier to just says I overegged it and mention the SFW aspectvof it rather than writing a tl:dr post about it? I'd had listened and I did as that was the last time I've mentioned such person.

    i don't even know what tl:dr means but the reason you got a heated post rather than a polite request was because it's a fucking disgrace to see that picture on this forum and you as the provoker needed a reality check. you shouldn't have needed it saying that constantly referencing a fairly bleak kind of pornography is not acceptable behaviour on a bike forum.

    It's very odd coming from a bloke who sparingly appear on the forum every now and then to have a says rather than contributing? You used to be a regular who have some good point to said.
    it's not odd from my position. I still come on here to look at stuff but after the geekfests, the shitstorms and the arguments that drag on for days about the slightest thing and the feeling I'd said enough about most things, I couldn't be arsed to post any more. not the same as contributing, ed. just because someone posts a fifty times a day doesn't mean their contribution is any more worthwhile in the long run.

    I had put that stupid topic on ignore and it's the first topic I've ignored on the forum, it's very irritating and bothering reading comment about my poor used of English, so I ignored it, it work at school, it work for me here, so fuck off with your implicating that I'm 'loving' it.
    fair enough, though i do think widespread forum approval has muddied your vision. There was a time you used to be a regular who to me represented the best of the forum. Now somehow you have come to represent the best and the worst of it, or at least had by yesterday when i found you coercing someone yet again into looking at something a lot of people wouldn't ever want to see.

About

Avatar for pajamas @pajamas started