-
• #27
Netted goals, length and width as in the two options I've linked to (we're potentially going to use this as our ideal court for the courts document and it will lead the courts for ExCel).
-
• #28
why have you change the widths?
Well we can still change any of the dimensions. I changed it as a few people have mentioned it looked a little thin and long before?
21m and 4m is an option, yep. I'd like to keep to 3m modular bits though... companies/builders seem to like that.
The first doc was based on Newington but with more room behind the goals, this second PDF takes a lead from Mitch, we have to decide what's best.
-
• #29
My preference would be worlds court 2 with more room behind goals
-
• #30
the bigger the better! we use 4m in toronto. safer, gives tons of room to set up an attack, great behind the goal passing, etc.
i can't think of any good reasons to have a short distance other than the excitement of errant slapshots shots bouncing off the back board for further scoring opportunities.
-
• #31
yeah, but in general you have way bigger courts or more accesibility to hockey or roller hockey courts.
keevvvinnnnn, keeeevvvvv, keevinnn!
-
• #32
fuck you buffalo bill! you're a beardy gay lord
-
• #33
big gay hosered... for life
-
• #34
big gay hosered... for life
ouch!
she's a lifer now.
why have you change the widths?
I like more the 21m width independt of how many meters behing the goal?
21m and 4m is not an option?