Well, I thought that maybe somewhere in that confused rant was a point that I made ages ago, about dope being technology, and the nebulous distinctions that are made between differing forms of performance-enhancing 'science'. I understand the concerns over riders' health and well-being in regards to in vivo technology, although I still think that if the UCI tolerated all drugs/physiological 'strategies', but made up as many stringent rules governing the use of them as they did about saddle setback and tube profiles, it *could *work.
Well, I thought that maybe somewhere in that confused rant was a point that I made ages ago, about dope being technology, and the nebulous distinctions that are made between differing forms of performance-enhancing 'science'. I understand the concerns over riders' health and well-being in regards to in vivo technology, although I still think that if the UCI tolerated all drugs/physiological 'strategies', but made up as many stringent rules governing the use of them as they did about saddle setback and tube profiles, it *could *work.