-
• #2852
how do you pronounce 'turbonegro'?
t u r b o n e g r o
-
• #2853
...for a post-op trans-sexual S&M addicted golden shower obsessed frotting fan gobble maniac...
[strike]Dont forget the felc[/strike]
I think she is more:
-
• #2855
What a load of weird rubbish.
-
• #2856
Seeing that it's A-Trak and Armand Van Helden confuses me even more... Why is it shit?! :-S
-
• #2857
The O God remix is way better.
-
• #2859
Wac!
-
• #2861
how do you pronounce 'turbonegro'?
Very fast, and with a dark undertone.
-
• #2862
Wac!
Not as in "one off" I hope?
-
• #2863
I'm watching that uni challenge now, but I don;t get why i got a question wrong:
3rd of March 2009 was a square root day as 03/03/09, when was the last square root day before it?
I thought 01/01/01, but the answer was 09/09/81. Why am I wrong?
-
• #2864
I'm watching that uni challenge now, but I don;t get why i got a question wrong:
3rd of March 2009 was a square root day as 03/03/09, when was the last square root day before it?
I thought 01/01/01, but the answer was 09/09/81. Why am I wrong?
Square Root Day occurs on the following dates each century:
- 1/1/01
- 2/2/04
- 3/3/09
- 4/4/16
- 5/5/25
- 6/6/36
- 7/7/49
- 8/8/64
- 9/9/81
- 1/1/01
-
• #2865
How predictable. :)
-
• #2866
I'm watching that uni challenge now, but I don;t get why i got a question wrong:
3rd of March 2009 was a square root day as 03/03/09, when was the last square root day before it?
I thought 01/01/01, but the answer was 09/09/81. Why am I wrong?
Square Root Day occurs on the following dates each century:
[]1/1/01
[]2/2/04
[]3/3/09
[]4/4/16
[]5/5/25
[]6/6/36
[]7/7/49
[]8/8/64
[*]9/9/81Surely the previous square root day to 3/3/09 would have had to be 2/2/04?
There's probably something terribly clever behind this.
-
• #2867
And why isn't there one on the 10/10/00 each century?
-
• #2868
And why isn't there one on the 10/10/00 each century?
Because 10 x 10 is 100.
-
• #2869
Because 10 x 10 is 100.
That was my point.
-
• #2870
That was my point.
00 isn't 100.
-
• #2871
00 isn't 100.
Yes, and 2009 isn't 3*3. 2000, 2100, etc. are all multiples of 100. I think they qualify as year markers just as much as the other years.
On a d100 roll (a roll with two dice that have the numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0 on them), a roll of two 0s is often used as the number 100, for instance.
-
• #2872
Yes, and 2009 isn't 3*3. 2000, 2100, etc. are all multiples of 100. I think they qualify as year markers just as much as the other years.
On a d100 roll (a roll with two dice that have the numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0 on them), a roll of two 0s is often used as the number 100, for instance.
Point is that the last 2 digits is the sum of the squares of the first two. That's all there is to it - that's the definition of Square Root Date, so "00" just doesn't work. And don't try to sneak it in, I'm watching.
You'll have to do a Ron Gordon and invent your own Double O Day.
-
• #2873
Point is that the last 2 digits is the sum of the squares of the first two. That's all there is to it - that's the definition of Square Root Date, so "00" just doesn't work. And don't try to sneak it in, I'm watching.
You'll have to do a Ron Gordon and invent your own Double O Day.
Edit - I mean multiplicand of the first two, not sum of squares. Or something. You knew that. Bloody whisky.
-
• #2874
Point is that the last 2 digits is the sum of the squares of the first two. That's all there is to it - that's the definition of Square Root Date
Well, that's just really boring. :)
-
• #2875
has he got a handbag dangling down his back?
Ha ha ha, classic!
Hipsters wet dream.