@Oliver Schick
No, apologies - having re-read my comments above, I wasn't clear. It looks like I'm against against enforcing a 20mph limit. I'm not. Though it might have been fun, trying to argue it in some convoluted way...
However, it would require a lot of political and persuasive effort. So I don't think it's what I'd demand first. I'd always support first proper separate routes. But given how unlikely that is, I'd probably then support introducing a strict liability law.
Then you're not aware that 20mph has made tremendous progress in recent years and is getting increasingly accepted, and that 'proper separate routes' would require far more political and persuasive effort. I agree that stricter liability would be a great thing. Do get involved in campaigning if you're interested in this sort of issue--which borough do you live in?
Then you're not aware that 20mph has made tremendous progress in recent years and is getting increasingly accepted, and that 'proper separate routes' would require far more political and persuasive effort. I agree that stricter liability would be a great thing. Do get involved in campaigning if you're interested in this sort of issue--which borough do you live in?