If it's constructive, then I don't think it's unnecessary.
Neither of these comments were constructive, so here, I agree with you.
My point is, I don't think it does anyone any favours to tread lightly around their talents (or lack of). People here are quick to call out those that might benefit from Cycle training, and so they should; this here's a cycling forum, and Cycle Training is, I'm sure, always beneficial.
So why not call out those who's artistic flair could do with some refining? Judging from the quality of what the op has posted, I'm presuming that they are not in the twilight years of their creative career, therefore any criticism, harsh or not, is a good indicator of if/where/how they might progress/improve/refine.
If it's constructive, then I don't think it's unnecessary.
Neither of these comments were constructive, so here, I agree with you.
My point is, I don't think it does anyone any favours to tread lightly around their talents (or lack of). People here are quick to call out those that might benefit from Cycle training, and so they should; this here's a cycling forum, and Cycle Training is, I'm sure, always beneficial.
So why not call out those who's artistic flair could do with some refining? Judging from the quality of what the op has posted, I'm presuming that they are not in the twilight years of their creative career, therefore any criticism, harsh or not, is a good indicator of if/where/how they might progress/improve/refine.
Performance > Feedback > Revision.