Thinking about it... it doesn't matter. The scheme has kickstarted a cycling movement and rejuvenated retail and development around cycling. There's no reason to expect that once it's fulfilled those objectives that it should continue to run as a tax-free subsidy. Cycling should now have it's own momentum to keep itself growing. If it capitulates because of a removal of subsidy it was a pretty weak movement.
That's true but I don't think people (or me at least) are looking at the bigger picture in that way - I'm just annoyed that I've signed up for something I thought was going down one way, and it turns out that actually it might end up something totally different.
That's true but I don't think people (or me at least) are looking at the bigger picture in that way - I'm just annoyed that I've signed up for something I thought was going down one way, and it turns out that actually it might end up something totally different.
All in the game tho' baby.