1. personal preference used to suggest fail = x2 fail.
    2. exaggeration of past isolated incident to manipulate current statistics = x2 fail.

    1) Not at all. You said it diluted the ride, I gave examples of how this isn't always the case and depends on your perspective.
    2) Again, not at all. I didn't exaggerate (although I note that you did exaggerate my point). I simply gave an example of where a suggestion of security through obscurity was flawed. Neither did I engage in statistical debate, mine was purely anecdotal. You offer it little credence and I accept that, but don't take it for what it wasn't.

About