No I didn't imply you are fundamental Christian or you supporter of Stalin.
There is no need for you to suppose that I have suggested this as firstly I don't think you are either and secondly you yourself say you are neither.
Let me explain.
I can see a false dilemma in the idea that if people don't support your claims then they must support 'the slash and burn policy we currently adopt' (the false dilemma here comes from the fact that there are, of course, people who might not agree with your claims but do not support a 'slash and burn policy' towards the earth's resources).
. . . . and by way of example I likened it (the false dichotomy - not you) to that similar argument you often hear from fundamental Christians, that if you are not a Christian then as an atheist you must be aligned with Stalin and the worst of his excesses - and by that I hoped to illustrate to you (as you are neither fundamental Christian nor a supporter of a dictatorial mass murderer) that your argument unfairly divides people into two groups when there are numerous other options.
Let me repeat, I am not calling you a Christian, nor am I calling you a supporter of Stalin.
No, I didn't misunderstand anything, I just won't be lectured by someone that shouts fraud at someone that believes something different to them.
Honestly I am not trying to have a go at you, you really did misunderstand a basic conversational device, and, of course I have shouted 'fraud' at no one.
As you have done since I mentioned that time travel is probably possible ...
Quote where I have shouted 'fraud' at you and I will apologise here on this thread (and mean it.).
No I didn't imply you are fundamental Christian or you supporter of Stalin.
There is no need for you to suppose that I have suggested this as firstly I don't think you are either and secondly you yourself say you are neither.
Let me explain.
I can see a false dilemma in the idea that if people don't support your claims then they must support 'the slash and burn policy we currently adopt' (the false dilemma here comes from the fact that there are, of course, people who might not agree with your claims but do not support a 'slash and burn policy' towards the earth's resources).
. . . . and by way of example I likened it (the false dichotomy - not you) to that similar argument you often hear from fundamental Christians, that if you are not a Christian then as an atheist you must be aligned with Stalin and the worst of his excesses - and by that I hoped to illustrate to you (as you are neither fundamental Christian nor a supporter of a dictatorial mass murderer) that your argument unfairly divides people into two groups when there are numerous other options.
Let me repeat, I am not calling you a Christian, nor am I calling you a supporter of Stalin.
Honestly I am not trying to have a go at you, you really did misunderstand a basic conversational device, and, of course I have shouted 'fraud' at no one.
Quote where I have shouted 'fraud' at you and I will apologise here on this thread (and mean it.).