if the evidence is there all of those institutions you listed will drop him like a ton of bricks.
ok, let's say armstrong doped and he did it to win races to raise his profile and raise money for cancer and become stonkingly rich. your question...does that make doping ok? well if he looked at the peleton in 1999 and saw it was riddled with doping cheats and that the only way to achieve said agenda was to dope....you answer your own question. (it's all hypothetical though)
all this anti armstrong stuff just smacks of moralising and the usual conspiracy theorists you find on the net. for all the things you read from people that say armstrong was a bully etc you read things that say what a great guy he is. I reckon that could be said for each and everyone of us. I suspect that there are many personal motives for people to hate armstrong on here that have more to do with peoples own lives than armstrong.
if the evidence is there all of those institutions you listed will drop him like a ton of bricks.
ok, let's say armstrong doped and he did it to win races to raise his profile and raise money for cancer and become stonkingly rich. your question...does that make doping ok? well if he looked at the peleton in 1999 and saw it was riddled with doping cheats and that the only way to achieve said agenda was to dope....you answer your own question. (it's all hypothetical though)
all this anti armstrong stuff just smacks of moralising and the usual conspiracy theorists you find on the net. for all the things you read from people that say armstrong was a bully etc you read things that say what a great guy he is. I reckon that could be said for each and everyone of us. I suspect that there are many personal motives for people to hate armstrong on here that have more to do with peoples own lives than armstrong.