clintsmoker, I notice in none of your posts you deny that Lance doped. He doped and lied about it. That's what annoys people. Nothing to do with alpha male blah blah..
of course i don't deny it. but then my opinion isn't going to be cross examined in court. your proof that he cheated wouldn't stand up in court.
actually if you read properly you'll see that what upsets most people on here is not only the fact that he might have doped but also many facets of his personality including his bullying. all this is based on what is tantamount to gossip. but it's all academic anyways, i mean it hardly matters right? if he is found out to be a cheating liar i'll probably still like him just as i'd still support west brom if they won something important and it turned out they cheated to do it. i suppose there comes a point when it is too farcical but seeing how cycling is basically the history of cheating and drugs then if lance was on drugs it's hardly farce, more like levelling the playing field. as far as i'm concerned sport is theatre and lance was pure theatre.
of course i don't deny it. but then my opinion isn't going to be cross examined in court. your proof that he cheated wouldn't stand up in court.
actually if you read properly you'll see that what upsets most people on here is not only the fact that he might have doped but also many facets of his personality including his bullying. all this is based on what is tantamount to gossip. but it's all academic anyways, i mean it hardly matters right? if he is found out to be a cheating liar i'll probably still like him just as i'd still support west brom if they won something important and it turned out they cheated to do it. i suppose there comes a point when it is too farcical but seeing how cycling is basically the history of cheating and drugs then if lance was on drugs it's hardly farce, more like levelling the playing field. as far as i'm concerned sport is theatre and lance was pure theatre.