The reason that I suggest those three is because it represents three very different views on humanity and spirituality. There are any number of atheists that I could invite but Dawkins could prove interesting because publically he has often relied on the agression of organised religion in his debating. Countering that with two very peaceful theists could well push his background arguments into open ground. I would love to see what common ground those three could attain.
The reason that I suggest those three is because it represents three very different views on humanity and spirituality. There are any number of atheists that I could invite but Dawkins could prove interesting because publically he has often relied on the agression of organised religion in his debating. Countering that with two very peaceful theists could well push his background arguments into open ground. I would love to see what common ground those three could attain.