"i was in a group of people doing illegal things en masse and ignoring commands to disperse engaging in violence against the police and the destruction of property when the office hit me" is not cause to sue.
They were not engagin in either illegal 'things' or causing destruction to property, i think you need to get to grasp with the facts of the matter...
yeah.
"hired thugs"
lol ok
oh and I hope im not the only one that believes we should take animal rights activists and use them for experiments.
exactly.
I'd rather some mouthy demonstrator got a smack than have the police under even more pressure when It comes down to actually taking action In circumstances that more people would deem "legitimate"
"Mouthy demonstrators" are the ones that got womne the vote, or poll tax revoked, bloody idiots the lot of them. as for my use of hired thugs? what is your definition of a thug? are the police not paid to do a similar job?
+1
They were not engagin in either illegal 'things' or causing destruction to property, i think you need to get to grasp with the facts of the matter...
"Mouthy demonstrators" are the ones that got womne the vote, or poll tax revoked, bloody idiots the lot of them. as for my use of hired thugs? what is your definition of a thug? are the police not paid to do a similar job?