-
• #28302
+1
+1
-
• #28303
Repost...
-
• #28304
This
-
• #28305
-
• #28306
+1
+1
-
• #28307
This
-
• #28308
-
• #28309
ha!
-
• #28310
Repost
-
• #28311
Ha! A re-post of the first ever post in this thread. I like it
-
• #28312
veeeery nice frame...those open pros?
yeah, open pro ceramic..
I am wondering about the non typical geometry of the kalavinka
the BB is not as high as usual on a track frame and the head tube angle looks not that steep as usual...
a frame for longer 500m beton track ?
-
• #28313
Now here's something i consider porn, and i couldn't care less if it's a REPOST!
Now that is a beautiful example of a bicycle.
PS: My personal pet hate is the constant quoting with image. When the original post is just above. Slows my shitrix connection right down.
PPS: Butthurt is my word of the day now :)
-
• #28314
yeah, open pro ceramic..
I am wondering about the non typical geometry of the kalavinka
the BB is not as high as usual on a track frame and the head tube angle looks not that steep as usual...
a frame for longer 500m beton track ?
I think they are actually open 4 CDs
-
• #28315
Yep, look like it. I've got them on my Pina
-
• #28316
true, but then that would mean everyone else who moans is a whiny little cunt as well.
if you actually read what I originally said you'd see I wasn't getting 'butthurt' over a duplicate image but rather the reapeated posting of people's own bikes in a thread dedicated to damn good looking bikes. there's not butthurting over here that's for sure.
I know it's a forum. dang, don't get your knickers in a twist dear.yeah i mean, you could do all of that, or you could stop being such a whining little cunt and remember its just a forum on the fucking internet and someone posting a duplicate image is not as issue worth getting so butthurt over.
-
• #28317
bb does indeed look a bit lower than it should be..
Yeah maybe soyeah, open pro ceramic..
I am wondering about the non typical geometry of the kalavinka
the BB is not as high as usual on a track frame and the head tube angle looks not that steep as usual...
a frame for longer 500m beton track ?
-
• #28318
aaaalright,it's the same bike, but different angle with a guy sitting on the bike getting colonic irrigation from a random guy named derek.
:/Is it though? I know we've seen the bike on here previously, but not that picture IIRC
-
• #28319
Just shown up on eBay.com.Absolutely gorgeous, one of the nicest frames in this thread, and its from so long ago....
You have to go back many many pages for real bike porn. It looks to me like this is turning into the "bike I found regardless of if its bike porn or not thread"
-
• #28320
possibly one of the best pix of a bike, shot by a true pro !
-
• #28321
yeah i mean, you could do all of that, or you could stop being such a whining little cunt and remember its just a forum on the fucking internet and someone posting a duplicate image is not as issue worth getting so butthurt over.
+1
-
• #28322
-1
-
• #28323
Absolutely gorgeous, one of the nicest frames in this thread, and its from so long ago....
You have to go back many many pages for real bike porn. It looks to me like this is turning into the "bike I found regardless of if its bike porn or not thread"
You see, to me this just looks like snot. Colours make it look cheap (i'm sure it's not) and I can't really see anything appealing.
I do wonder sometimes - if the same frame had Muddy Fox on it or some other low to mid-range bike name, would you still spill some of your man mayonaise on the keyboard?
-
• #28324
or you could fuck off and stop ruining the bike porn thread.
so that people can enjoy it.
you twat.
You, my friend, are a cock.
Anyway...
-
• #28325
can anyone shed any light on why the seatstays would be done like that, surely it would be a lot weaker?
+1