Again - This is the argument that will be used as it is the one currently being used against motorcyclists.
Cycling is not just about risk, it has benefit too, roughly proportional to the amount of cycling that goes on. So, if doubling the cycling decreases the per cycling risk by 1/3, then society gets twice the benefit for only 4/3 of the total risk.
Cycling is not just about risk, it has benefit too, roughly proportional to the amount of cycling that goes on. So, if doubling the cycling decreases the per cycling risk by 1/3, then society gets twice the benefit for only 4/3 of the total risk.