Hypothetical law change? Lorry on bike: lorry's fault. Bike on ped: bike's fault

Arg no, I meant what I said. Driver not cyclist.

What I meant was: cyclists are hesitant about assuming liability because it then means that they themselves become liable if they hit a pedestrian.

Yet if you look at the probabilities involved between:

a: hitting a litigious pedestrian
b: being hit by a car

I know which one I'd take.

Yep I'm hesitant too.