Cyclist not driver.
Arg no, I meant what I said. Driver not cyclist.
What I meant was: cyclists are hesitant about assuming liability because it then means that they themselves become liable if they hit a pedestrian.
Yet if you look at the probabilities involved between:
a: hitting a litigious pedestrian b: being hit by a car
I know which one I'd take.
@ocdc started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
Arg no, I meant what I said. Driver not cyclist.
What I meant was: cyclists are hesitant about assuming liability because it then means that they themselves become liable if they hit a pedestrian.
Yet if you look at the probabilities involved between:
a: hitting a litigious pedestrian
b: being hit by a car
I know which one I'd take.