I can't make sense out of the first sentence, nobody is suggesting banning cycling, and even if they had I'm not sure how that would discredit the stats that show more cyclists = safer roads.
Doubles in cycling numbers can expect a one-third drop in the per-cyclist frequency of a crash with a motor vehicle therefore the total number increases.
Doubles in cycling numbers can expect a one-third drop in the per-cyclist frequency of a crash with a motor vehicle therefore the total number increases.