Hypothetical law change? Lorry on bike: lorry's fault. Bike on ped: bike's fault

Peds? That means you basically need to be insured to walk the streets though. We can't have that. If Strict Liability bites downwards, wouldn't you be willing to assume responsibility for the safety of pedestrians in order to receive such protection in kind from drivers?

Cyclist not driver.

Oh and the mobile comments were pointing out that use of mobiles behind the wheel is allowed just not holding them. The surveys make little difference between the two. Yet still allowed to have a phone conversation while driving.