Hypothetical law change? Lorry on bike: lorry's fault. Bike on ped: bike's fault

And? Surely if you agree that drivers arguing against drivers automatically beingn seen as at fault in a driver/ped collision makes it sound like they regularly have collisions with peds. You must believe that cyclsts arguing against cyclists automatically beingn seen as at fault in a cyclist/ped collision makes it sound like they regularly have collisions with peds. No?

it's simply a case of 'bigger vehicle = more harm', a bicycles, even though it's simply a peds on a bike, go faster and can cause more harm than a 'peds-on-peds' incident, which usually involved a small discussion on how to 'watch it' and lots of apologising afterware.

it's seemed like the logic choice after all.