If a cyclist collides with a ped they both could be badly injured or worse (which is not true in a car).
And? Surely if you agree that drivers arguing against drivers automatically beingn seen as at fault in a driver/ped collision makes it sound like they regularly have collisions with peds. You must believe that cyclsts arguing against cyclists automatically beingn seen as at fault in a cyclist/ped collision makes it sound like they regularly have collisions with peds. No?
And? Surely if you agree that drivers arguing against drivers automatically beingn seen as at fault in a driver/ped collision makes it sound like they regularly have collisions with peds. You must believe that cyclsts arguing against cyclists automatically beingn seen as at fault in a cyclist/ped collision makes it sound like they regularly have collisions with peds. No?