If you are trying to say it is legal to do so, then you are correct- well done.
your entire post is incomprehensible to me:
No sentences here make sense- I've been trying to read it for a little while.
but I will try and argue with what I think is your point:
Distractions are not singular whilst on the road, they are cumulative (they add up). So if you get in a car and are distracted to begin with- any more distractions en route will increase your distraction level.
mobile phone use, or even conversations of any kind (I AGAIN refer you to my link) are significant distractors, with ALL categories for reaction speed and driving decision making being statistically significantly lower than even an intoxicated person- a hallmark and a current focus of dangerous driving campaigns.
So how many times will you post that link, and make the point that if its so bad why don't the government ban it?
If you are not paying attention/distracted at what point does the distraction become total? Proof being I'm watching tele and messing around on the internet.
So how many times will you post that link, and make the point that if its so bad why don't the government ban it?
If you are not paying attention/distracted at what point does the distraction become total? Proof being I'm watching tele and messing around on the internet.
PS cleaning a bike, pah.