-
• #8952
hahaha
-
• #8953
G-shock
-
• #8954
-
• #8955
what a cunt.
-
• #8956
My Hero
-
• #8957
needs foot retention and it'd be ready for a bike porn thread, imo
-
• #8958
It has. Clips and straps
-
• #8959
-
• #8960
ugh
-
• #8961
I put it in anti as a safety measure as it is a Mash, although it is not the worse I've seen -
• #8962
Must be one of my fans
-
• #8963
Wank!
-
• #8964
http://steadyrollin.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/cimg0256.jpg
what frame is that? doesn't look like the standard chinese made "on steroids" thing
-
• #8965
needs foot retention and it'd be ready for a bike porn thread, imo
awesome!! definitely ready for the pro porn thread.
-
• #8966
I don't get what it is really for, but I want it.
-
• #8967
-
• #8968
it's an interesting bike.
anti for me because of the lack of rear brake.
-
• #8969
it's an interesting bike.
anti for me because of the lack of rear brake.
same reason for me, and aero tubing with canti's? -
• #8970
Ed, that is the lamest reason for something being anti ive ever heard!
its an interesting idea, but poorly carried out IMO, it could have been awesome, but ultimately, isnt.
-
• #8971
aero tubing with canti's?
Specialized Transition, Cervelo patent application, some weird 1980s thing
(not illustrated)which has been posted in Porn before IIRC. Aero + Cantilevers isn't the thing which is wrong with this bike.
3 Attachments
-
• #8972
it's an interesting bike.
anti for me because of the lack of rear brake.
you ride brakeless for fucks sake, the rider of this may be just as "skilled" as you
-
• #8973
I don't ride a freewheel bicycle brakeless you trollop.
and I never claimed that I'm skilled, stop being a sloppy tissue.
-
• #8974
sloppy tissue? soggy surely?
-
• #8975
hopefully not a repost,
hyper huge picture.......