Hypothetical law change? Lorry on bike: lorry's fault. Bike on ped: bike's fault

Dear lynx,
You haven't read my link.
Here it is again:
[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phones_and_driving_safety[/ame]
Rgds.
Henry

If you are trying to say it is legal to do so, then you are correct- well done.
your entire post is incomprehensible to me:

There is no need to insinuate it, you can drive a vehicle and have a conversation on the mobile, as long as its not in your hands. What I will repeat is that if you are not paying attention, such as mind else where for what ever reason such as a sick parent or child d other distractions have any effect.

No sentences here make sense- I've been trying to read it for a little while.
but I will try and argue with what I think is your point:
Distractions are not singular whilst on the road, they are cumulative (they add up). So if you get in a car and are distracted to begin with- any more distractions en route will increase your distraction level.
mobile phone use, or even conversations of any kind (I AGAIN refer you to my link) are significant distractors, with ALL categories for reaction speed and driving decision making being statistically significantly lower than even an intoxicated person- a hallmark and a current focus of dangerous driving campaigns.