Hypothetical law change? Lorry on bike: lorry's fault. Bike on ped: bike's fault

*I don't think this when I drive- maybe you might, but generalisations are not useful either.
*
wait that's a generalisation. FUCK I hate Karl Popper.
umm- basically all swans are white. because I say so.
I'll edit:
Of the people who drive on here- I wonder who thinks this. Ed make a valid point- the cost to a person in a crash is monetary as well as pyschological or physical.

Popped out for dinner/lunch snack, back now. Did I mention how I drive? I mentioned a generalisation I feel from cycling, riding and driving round the country.

Ever been surprised that they have to do it to make a living?
I don't think you ride enough to question other people's riding in london if the answer is yes.
poor rhetoric won't get your point any credit here.

before I say 'wrong' what point is this trying to prove?

The point I've been trying to make, and I feel like is being missed, is that paying attention to what is going on around you if you don't pay attention does it matter if your on the phone, drunk, wondering if you can afford that new sexy merino wool rapha top?

Having lived europe I get the feeling that having a culture where cycling, scooter and driving go hand in hand growing up that the drivers are more aware of cyclists and motorcyclists.