Delusional? and not providing any proof? what of, the 'free energy' machine...?
Yes, free energy machine.
Get a grip, The whole Op original discussion was discussing freedom...?
And yet your opening gambit makes claims for free energy machines - and its hypothetical impact on freedom.
[ . . . ] you think that if there was 'free energy' you (despite your protestations) should be allowed to have it? even though you think it is bollocks and that anyone championing it is a 'delusional motherfucker'...
Yes, because someone thinks something is unlikely - does not mean that some punitive process must follow where they are denied this thing for doubting it.
those 'delusional mothefuckers' are surely going to pat you on the head and say yes of course...it's all here...look...>>>
Why on earth would they not ? If you can provide proof then you will win over the doubters, why not then provide the proof ?
I suspect, as I am sure we all do now, that you cannot provide any credible evidence because there is no credible evidence.
Have we got to the 'you work for the government' section yet, I want to go out ?
Yes, free energy machine.
And yet your opening gambit makes claims for free energy machines - and its hypothetical impact on freedom.
Yes, because someone thinks something is unlikely - does not mean that some punitive process must follow where they are denied this thing for doubting it.
Why on earth would they not ? If you can provide proof then you will win over the doubters, why not then provide the proof ?
I suspect, as I am sure we all do now, that you cannot provide any credible evidence because there is no credible evidence.
Have we got to the 'you work for the government' section yet, I want to go out ?