Hypothetical law change? Lorry on bike: lorry's fault. Bike on ped: bike's fault

This is a very poor argument indeed.
Must Try Harder.

I'm going to pick apart the usual stupidity of your posts because I'm bored
1.ed in no way suggests that mobiles are the sole cause.
2.
yup this comment makes perfect sense, because it has been proven that if you don't pay attention whilst you do anything- you do worse at it.
(in case this isn't clear- I'm laughing at the ridiculous tautology in the statement)

things that distract you- make you pay less attention, by their very definition.
Mobile phones distract you. The act of carrying a conversation, let alone holding a rectangular object to your skull, has been shown to be able to distract a driver enough to significantly slow down reaction speed.

Lynx - you are either the master wind up artist, very bored, or just very poor at making a point. I'm going to allow you to try and make a cogent reply, and await it with baited breath.
Furthermore, of the menaces on the road of London today, mobile phones are high on my list. Not looking is inevitable, but a mobile phone usage means that even with a definite look the driver may not register you are there.

I'm sorry lynx, normally I don't like it when people pick on you, but recently I have come to the conclusion that it is fair.

The point that I trying to make is nothing will alter some people delusion of the 'i'm in a metal box nothing can hurt me crumple zone, air bang brake assist' this the attitude that needs to change. Never had a cabby uturn on you for a fair on the opposite side of the road?

Great britian is not the rest of europe and driving styles and attitudes are very different.