Just to be clear, are you accepting that there's no need for a bike to bike rule, based on this conversation or will you want to revisit this later?
For the record, I'm not necessarily right in my opinion, there may be a circumstance that necessitates the creation of a rule. But, to date I haven't seen evidence which provides the need for it. If you think I'm wrong then please tell me, just back it up with your reasoning.
Em, I think we have to agree to disagree. We can both see the same the evidence, but we have drawn different conclusions.
Em, I think we have to agree to disagree. We can both see the same the evidence, but we have drawn different conclusions.