I'm really sorry to everyone else who must be bored out of their minds by this.
I thought that by engaging, I might persuade someone that the particular piece of legislation was not what some people seemed to think it was.
I think it may be better to stop now.
I was just trying to get over my own view - that there was no need for such things as veganism and non-belief (in something) to be protected under law as there is vanishingly little need for it.
But we seemed to have drifted up a conversational river of shit.
I was just trying to get over my own view - that there was no need for such things as veganism and non-belief (in something) to be protected under law as there is vanishingly little need for it.
But we seemed to have drifted up a conversational river of shit.