I feel rather sorry for Karl Popper. His output was far more useful than Wittgenstein's (if such a statement can be made at all), but Wittgenstein is canonised as some mystical troubled genius who delivered these impenetrable insights about the composition of reality. IMO Popper had a much higher demonstrable effect/output, but is scarcely remembered.
Hells yeah! I'm all about the Popper me! Serious. He's the reason I ended up doing Philosophy of Physics. *Boyband love.
Greasy, I've heard that honey fact before but I have some runny honey that's gone a funny colour and started to dry up and crystalise. It's barely spreadable now and I reckon left to it's own devices it's going to dry out into honey-dust. Delicious honey dust.
Hells yeah! I'm all about the Popper me! Serious. He's the reason I ended up doing Philosophy of Physics. *Boyband love.
Greasy, I've heard that honey fact before but I have some runny honey that's gone a funny colour and started to dry up and crystalise. It's barely spreadable now and I reckon left to it's own devices it's going to dry out into honey-dust. Delicious honey dust.