yep. bit of a broad brush stroke to go from their to assume he actually killed people... but it is the senseless slaughter of innocents that they need to stop and there is no easy way for that
Rachels article does bring up the interesting fact that people will confess to anything. If they genuinely know nothing they cannot confess. if questions are directed then yes. but then its pointless.
I dont like it one bit.. but.. there is a place for it. it should be the absolute last step AND when you know they are guilty but you need that little bit more information to make the difference and save lifes.
Am i right in thinking the rule of Iraq was kept in place by constant torture and strong arm tactics? so haven't we reduced the amount of suffering?
yep. bit of a broad brush stroke to go from their to assume he actually killed people... but it is the senseless slaughter of innocents that they need to stop and there is no easy way for that
Rachels article does bring up the interesting fact that people will confess to anything. If they genuinely know nothing they cannot confess. if questions are directed then yes. but then its pointless.
I dont like it one bit.. but.. there is a place for it. it should be the absolute last step AND when you know they are guilty but you need that little bit more information to make the difference and save lifes.
Am i right in thinking the rule of Iraq was kept in place by constant torture and strong arm tactics? so haven't we reduced the amount of suffering?